Symbology: On the Surface, and Below

Symbology has the power to unite a people under an idea, and move mountains; however, it can also fractionalize humanity to the point of extinction.  As designed by the creator(s) of a symbol,  can have a specific intentional meaning; however, there can also be intentional subsurface meanings, as well as unintended invocations of alternate meanings based on the interpretation of these symbols by a people of alternate perspectives.  So we have symbols that could be in plain sight, and have powerful, secret meaning to a large collective of people.  Paranoia.  No, not really.  Just look at US national fraternities, who have symbols within their shields, and even a name has alternate meanings.

We will explore several symbols, and what they invoke within us, and then conclude on the strong statement on how humanity can be fractionalized to the point of extinction.  The first symbol I would like to cover is the cross, or more commonly, the crucifix.  On the surface, from an outsider perspective, I would say that this symbol can invoke a mean of ‘courage through adversity’.  Although I did not have deep seeded roots of religion growing up as a child, and was not born into Christianity, there was a time in my life, my latter teenage youth, where the poem ‘Footprints in the Sand’ invoked a strength in me that I needed at a time when a connection to a greater collective, a connection with G-d was required.  At the most desperate of times, when I could not connect to a religion, or an abstract sense of the Lord, this connection was made. As I grew up, and came to think about symbology, and what it could invoke, as well as ‘life happening’, I came to look at the cross in several alternate perspectives.  One perspective is a warning to those who look to follow in the footsteps of a person looking toward a collective good, beware, people are …  In some sense, the cross feels like a warning, or a threat.   If I were to progress the meaning, if I believe in Christ, ‘when I die’, I will be saved.   This focus seems to be on the death ‘worship’, and less on the joys, and I agree, the painful lessons of ‘life’.  Salvation will come from death?  I hope not, although I am still young, and most likely foolish in more ways than one.    Think the lessons of the man Jesus, as I understand them from third person, such as ‘let no man or [woman] cast a stone…’, are brilliant at their core, full stop.  Empathy is a key to the awakening of our  collective conscious, and this very empathetic man two thousand years ago seemed to understand that, and tap into its potential, unfortunately, to his own demise.

Symbology can fractionalize humanity to the point of extinction.  Actually, I’m not the one who first made this statement.  In not so many words, it was one of the original ten commandments, and as quoted from Exodus 20:x (or more precisely from Wikipedia…

“You shall not make for yourself an idol, whether in the form of anything that is in heaven above, or that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.”

If we are to abide by this statement, none of us, would be in observance of this commandment, even the Star of David,  the flag of Israel could be argued as ignoring this commandment.    Take this law to a more granular extent, even language could be seen as symbology, especially those languages such as those derived from Aramaic, or Chinese.  In chinese a single character can invoke symbolism, even intended in a positive sense, such as happiness.

THen again, if we were perfect would be be breathing the air from our lungs as we do?

Any symbology can lead to a conclusive end to the human species, whether we are as a collective fractionalized by so many symbols that there is not enough collective power within us as a people, and in that case, bound to continually perpetuate slavery of the mind.  Slavery in many forms, some which we cannot phantom, and some which we can see.    If we bind ourselves to a particular symbol, or group of symbols, literally or figuratively, we risk marginalizing the potential capabilities, and energy within the belief in self, the human species as a whole collective, and the collective self in the wider, grander design of existence.    Fractionalized by symbology we can be easily swayed to one belief or another, and consistently removed from the design of self, and the creation design around us.

Although symbology, such as the Star of David, and other symbols relating to stars and moons, is symbology, it still stays close to the design of nature around us, the stars above, and a slight reflection of our local star, the sun, in the case of the crescent and star.  I find that these to symbols invoke more subsurface truisms that are extremely powerful, yet secretive at their core.  These two symbols predominant in two major religions almost point to distant origins, if we were to think in the Science Fiction, ‘Battlestar Galactica’, thirteen tribes, sort of way.  The crescent almost implies, or tilts its cap, ever so slightly to the recognition of the local Star.  If you want to Science Fiction this to the max, you could say Stars are like the Ori in Stargate, but that would be going a bit far.  What of Sun worshiping, like the Astec, and more hidden in recent times? Interesting conclusions, and odd endings.   What of light from distant stars, is that ‘Ancient’ light?

We could go on, and on.  Is the truth right in front of us, or have I had a lack of sleep, and letting my imagine get away. Imagination is a powerful thing, especially in a society of ‘freedom of thought’, specifically not constricted by any symbols.   Either way you go, there are extremes, and either way can tip the scales in unintended consequences.  Your enemies’ greatest strength is also their greatest weakness.  The best place to be for all maybe somewhere gravitating toward the middle, and when the friction gets too intense, we can gravitate outward again, and repeat the cycle.  Come to think of it….

Best.

Market Volatility, and the Collective Selfishness

Imagine the media, if you will, or salesmen of a product or service can induce a fear in you in order for you to purchase.  Yeah, I know, not hard to imagine.

Imagine if you will a single individual, or group of individuals, can create waves in the markets in order to drive market prices up or down, and profit off of the volatility of  the market, in order to make a profit.  Yeah, I know, not hard to imagine.

Now imagine, the human species evolved to the point where an individual can be an evolutionary catalyst for positive change of the species, to help the collective reach their full potential, and how do they use him, or her?   Do they try to utilize this gift, or would they take this individual, and try to make him happy one day and sad the next to drive short term stock prices, and waves of profitability?   Hard to imagine..  Yeah, I know.

Enjoy the waves.  I hope you can swim with the real sharks, as some of you are truly acting like them.   It could be worse.  Yeah, I know.

Blind Man in Boundless Mansion

I am a blind, young man smelling and feeling my way around, what feels like a boundless mansion.  There are, however, others with me, I sense.  Are they Fraternity and Sorority Members:

a) Elitists taunting the blind man, hoping to mock him as he stumbles and falls

b) Helping the pledge though the trials of their house, hoping he will become a brother

c) Callous of either outcome, and follow the pack Alpha leader to whatever end will become of him.

Collective Human Society may go the way of the Bird

Some believe the dinosaur, or some species of dinosaur may have evolved to the point of a higher intelligence than we once thought, and eventually was selected, some say by nature, to be banished in its previous forms.  Some dinosaurs may have become alternate creatures, like a bird. Some of these creatures may have had a capacity to even form collectives of much higher intelligence, possibly even a collective intelligence.  I remember that one episode on Star Trek: Voyager (Distant Origin), where Dinosaurs actually were in space, traveling among the stars.

Here in our living environment we have much greater challenges than we can possibly realize, and one in fact that we may have shared with the Dinosaur, we, as a majority collective, maybe by a combination of biological design, and conditioning are headed the way of the bird, and that’s if ‘nature’ has an ‘empathetic heart’ for some of our species.  I just think of that great story line in “The Restaurant at the End of the Universe”, where the people of a particular planet evolve into birds, a story of a people who by their sad nature don’t understand how to collectively survive, and all end up making shoes, their economy tanks, and then they evolve into birds because they don’t want to walk on the planet.  Douglas Adams, a brilliant man, who in some ways has helped me, G-d rest his soul.

If you look at collectives around you, such as the bees, they are electing not to rejoin this universe, this alternate universe, one of many in a boundless multiverse.  If you believe in Dr. Brian Greene’s theory, the Cosmologist, regarding if we live in a boundless universe, an infinite number of alternate universes is possible;  he also postulates at the macro perspective, he believes the multiverse is finite.  Not sure I agree with that.  Dr. Greene has also stated that each of these alternate universes cannot intersect, and I am fairly certain I do not agree with that.  Under certain conditions, I believe the transference of energy between alternate universes is possible.  I’d use the analogy of biological cells within a body, and at times these cell walls are permeable, sometimes in one direction, sometimes in a bidirectional fashion.  Dr. Greene also has an interesting mathematical theory that eludes to,  we, statistically speaking, live in what he terms as an ‘alternate simulated universe.’  There’s a great podcast produced by RadioLab of NPR WNYC regarding multiverses, hosted as a part of the ‘Giants of Science’ series.  Check it out. It puts these concepts in simple terms.

Some of us as a human species may be acting like a self destructive, resilient virus to the Earth, and all the collectives around us, and who really wants to live in a universe with that?    Guess it just depends on if we can adapt and evolve to live in the collective at large.

Some species learn to live in ‘our collective environment’, interacting in a way that is contributive to the ‘vibrations’, or harmony of existence.  We, in part, are a deceptive culture, collectively speaking, creating noise, a frictional, tension of melodies not just to our partners in our environment, but within our own collectives.

Are we are an experiment, a building block in an environment?  If you think of an child of a species with the capacity to create alternate universes, and the goal is to produce a self contained, environment thats’ decay rate is the longest in their classroom of children, they in turn get to evolve to the next level of their existence.

However, using the same analogy, if you identify a component that hastens the decay rate, you would try to change or remove those components.   It depends on that ‘Child’, they could be the kind of Child that just ’shakes his fish bowl’, and see if His universe adapts to the change.   Or, He could be they type of Child that tries to influence His universe with minor changes, as not to disrupt the entire set of collectives.   The goal could be to create a universe that either has a slow or non-existent decay rate, with the most unique collective elements.  If that is so, and the Child is mature, a gradual, and more progressive interventions may be required.   A combination of interventions may also be possible.

It could become a Classroom problem for the Children to solve.  It really depends on the building blocks, and how much potential energy there is in that alternate universe with or without significant instablility, or massive rate of decay.

In simple terms, its like being a scientist, whom measures the radioactive decay rate of elements, and tries to harness the energy given off by those elements, without the creation of catastrophic outcomes.  Also, if you think of these elements as finite, you must figure out how to slow their decay rate, or bring it to a nil decay rate.  Imagine a self contained bottle of elements that produce energy without ever requiring any additional catalysts.  An initial catalyst to make an compounded element configuration produce energy, and decay may be a necessary to combine multiple elements.  However, depending upon the elements, a catalyst element may also be a destructive element to the collective, and cause a decay rate to occur where none existed.   However, if you remove any one component of a specific element compound, it may become completely unstable, hasten the decay, and eventually collapse.  A balancing act, which makes the guy at the circus juggling knives look relatively simple.

Now imagine a universe of compound elements (bonded elements), and under the specific conditions, we’ve got a universe, which can not only exist, and produce energy, without decay, it can also produce another ‘Child’ like in that analogy we used before, the Classroom.  Yeah, I know, that was a big leap.  Huge leap for most of this audience, but still.

So, in painful, plain, simple terms, Man, and Woman, what drives us as a collective to exist in this universe, that, and several other combination of elements of existence seem to be self destructive.  However, if we are a self destructive collective that means, well, overall, could mean just a literal false positive as a first prize.  Just like the dinosaur, maybe, its evolutionary path, one or  both, carnivorous and herbivorous creatures ended up either exiting this universe, stage left please, or transfiguring to the bird, for whatever intentions.  Maybe our Child in that Classroom, our universe Creator though that laying eggs, such as reptiles and birds do, is a good thing, and this type of reproduction leads to a contributive collective to their own species, or at least to the collective at large, without varying the decay rate of our universe.  Maybe, just maybe, by keeping the birds, or reptiles in some form, in part, they may serve as enlightenment for others.

If the majority of our human collective reaches a ‘tipping point’ of so called ‘bad behavior’, I think, well lets just say did you ever see a child not able to be able to shake that toy, that Etch A Sketch, and start over?  That Child in that Classroom, has either tried to shake our environment to help, ’shake us up’, and help us change our ways, or eventually, may just shake us out completely.  It really depends upon what’s left when the shake up occurs.  Its all about decay rates, and energy output.   If you tap or shake a fishbowl, to get a catfish to move, sometimes you wind up with, lets just say consequences, such as killing the catfish with kindness.

Honestly, I’m not sure if we can change our collective ways to avoid a decay rate.  If you look at the permutations of our humanity, or collective society, variations, even when we intentionally try to change to a better path, consequences of that alteration can hasten the decay rates.  Its not like we as a collective species do not have immense potential.  Its our path and priorities, which determine our maturity potential as a collective.

Although some of us may not already realize where we are on the evolutionary level of existence, I believe that much of what I write about is not a secret to some, and in fact, I might be behind the curve of what is, and is not known.  For better or worse, I am left in the dark, figuratively speaking (and also an ‘inside’ joke), and the building blocks of our universe may require that some of us, at least, whomever is left, to be that blind Man in our boundless gateways.  All I believe is that there are components missing from our collective, and the more that are removed, the less likely we are to survive.

Is the universe expanding or contracting according to the science news of the day, and how is that currently measured?  With what level of accuracy, and delay?  As an example, if it takes a signal x period of time to reach us, based on how we are able ‘pick up’ and interpret that information, it may be too late to understand the effect of our persistence.

At the moment I cannot perform this analysis as a full time profession, such as in a think tank, I can only take time out at this brief moment to attempt, in isolation, to potentially propose solutions.  I’m not sure that defining this solution in this isolated way is the best method for the collective, however, the powers that be have it so.

Here are the areas we may be able to improve upon, but without uniformity, and representative, even in isolation, a ‘think tank’ collective to honestly extend this conversation, we are subjects to that Child, the One, the Shaker of the fish tank, in the hopes the cat fish will…

Areas of Improvement:

1 – Breeding and Transfiguration

– a sexual reproduction, and redesign?

2- Collective Intelligence

3- Education and Evolution

I’m not saying we should be like the Wraith on the show Stargate Atlantis; however, I’m also not precluding that from being a possible existence within our multiverse.  Stargate SG-1, and Atlantis, I’d take a look at that series if I were you, not so much for the cast of characters, and any specific plots, but the main ‘bad’ and ‘good’ guys.  You know that song, ‘Upside Down’, by Jack Johnson, I’m not sure about anything when some truth is baked within.

A Bite into the Fruit of Knowledge…

If you take a big bite of the apple, you may get the pits included with the sweet fruit of knowledge. Although, it sounds like a crunchy, experience, from which one would like to avoid, it also can plant a seed into the soul. You gain knowledge, once sweet, bitter now. We are One

Stop Acting Like Fleas and More Like Penicillin

Don't Be an Itchy Flea

We all live in collectives [of some level] of intelligence, collectives of existence, alternate universes, cognizant or not.   Some collectives of intelligence are on the evolutionary scale of a microbe as to a human being.  This is not just an analogous, this is truth, and we are all just units, of inputs of perspective, perception which are members of intelligent collectives.   Some collectives of intelligence have existed, ‘longer than others’, or better understanding, not existed longer than others, because existence is a constant, as well as time, but to be more precise, some collectives of intelligence have existed on a level, which allows for permeable translation of energy, information transfer, sometimes it’s a one way transfer, but other times its a mutual exchange of information to allow each of these collectives to grow and collapse, as they desire, in and out, of what we would call existence.  The more a particular type of collective intelligence has a mutual exchange of information with other collectives, the greater an understanding it can have of existence itself.

That said, if let’s say fleas all could speak with one another, were intelligent, but fought for resources, they were a so called collective of intelligence, but a nuisance to let’s say each other, and quite possibly in the grand scheme of things, they were a nuisance to the other things within existence, such as the dogs, which they survive upon.  Well, a plain old wild dog can just sometimes bite them off.  If these dogs belong to a larger collective intelligence, let’s say humans, well, then a human might just go bring the dog to the vet, and get the fleas cleaned off, and maybe even get them a flea collar to prevent them from ever existing.

I’d analogously represent us, the human, flesh and blood, collective to that of the flea, and the dog, well, let’s just say, we are very, very, very, very, low, on what could only be understood by human’s as ‘the food chain’, even though ‘food chain’ on higher plains of collective intelligence are irrelevant.  Let’s just try to get the closest analogous representation to a higher collective intelligence, let’s just hypothetically say the Earth herself, and the Sun, are collectives of intelligence, and we may just be like fleas to the Earth.  Well, if the Earth gets annoyed, it might just try to bite us off with like with earthquakes, volcanoes, etc.  That’s if she’s a wild, rogue, dog.

But let’s then just say that the Earth belongs to a wider collective, or joins one, just to get rid of this pesky nuisance called humans.  Well, we could have that whole flea collar, vet thing happen.  Nasty stuff. 

But let’s just then say that this wider collective, lets analogously say the dog, e.g. the Earth, is brought to the vet., and this very smart veterinarian, which belongs to this larger collective of doctors figures out that if the flea acts in a certain way, under certain circumstances, it could be a positive force in the wider collective existence.  Initially, well, the veterinarian, even though it would be considered a sophisticated Doctor, prominent within its own collective, and maybe rightfully so, based on their current understanding of existence, figures out that if you use the blood of these fleas, extract it, well then poof, you’ve got yourself a cure.

However, let’s say this vet decides to discuss the idea with other doctors outside their field, let’s just say, the larger community of doctors, and not just vets, but doctors of other fields, analogous to the ‘other collectives of intelligence’, like an exchange of information with specialists in other fields, and now they collectively agree that if the fleas’ blood is extracted during a particular life cycle, it could produce all types of cures for things, but the catch is the flea needs ‘to exist in a certain way’ before the ‘magic juice’ can be extracted.

Well, at first, the doctors try grooming the fleas, creating environments, and that works in some ways, then the doctors discover that the fleas actually evolve (if we eliminate time, because we understand that it takes millions of years to evolve), to become cognizant of what’s going on.  “Hey, these doctors are creating environments for us, and then taking something from us.”  It’s kind of like, but not exactly like ‘The Bee Movie’  

Bee Part Of the Collective of Collectives, but don't avoid the truth

So the fleas go on strike or revolt because they feel they are being taken advantage of, and maybe the intelligent collective, the fleas sometimes benefit, and maybe they don’t.  Point is, existence, the ability to “zoom your focus” of existence is diminished.  It’s like being stuck with a 35 – 72 mm lens for the rest of your existence, and not being able to observe a bird’s natural habitat, if you’re a bird lover, and want to understand your own greater love of thyself through birds.  Or if you’re a microbiologist, same analogy, you’re stuck with an xxx lens for your microscope, and can’t get past some area of focus.

Point is, in ‘the Bee Movie’ though, Bees realize they need to do what they ‘naturally do’ to help the wider collective, and I get that.  Some of the bees even enjoy ’doing their jobs’ no matter how mundane it may seem to the others.    However, we must remember that we live in a boundless multiverse, where infinite, alternate universes exist.   Another point is, if you destabilize a collective, even a collective of intersecting collectives, rarely anyone wins.    Darwin thinks the strong survive, or step on an ant hill, and they’ll just build a bigger one, right?  Well, sometimes that’s true, but sometimes that can be bad, at least if we are talking about a greater understanding, and building a wider focus to existence, or want to have as many interchangeable lens as you possibly can to zoom or widen your focus.  If you kill the queen of a particular bee colony, you may kill off the colony, and not have that influence in your life, but you’ve just unknowingly terminated your eventual path of existence.  

Like one of my favorite writers, Douglas Adams wrote about in ‘the Restaurant at the End of the Universe’, where this planet of people got rid of all their seemingly useless people, used car salesmen, phone sanitizers, etc., by sending them to another planet, which winds up being Earth, the original planet dies of a plague from a dirty phone, which could have been avoided by the phone sanitizers.

All Jobs / Perspectives are Valuable in a Collective, even Phone Sanitizers

Trouble is, if we suddenly can see with the best lens ever, we might go blind, bump into walls, or like the moth to a flame, and bump into the Sun.   More likely, if we zoom in or out too quickly, we lose the perspective, and the image of what we think we see, and we may make make rash decisions based upon incorrectly analyzed information.    The tricky bit, is figuring out a progression, that’s a stabilizing matrix, a collective of collective intelligences, which can expand and contract, or collapse at will, and can, well, be stable. 

Next time we’ll discuss Penicillin.

Intersecting Collectives, Permeable Bubble Universes, and Our Sandbox

If you believe in a boundless Universe, then there are an infinite number of Alternate Universes.  Each single triangle represents a bubble, or alternate universe, and the below figure represents the interaction between the alternate universes.  Dr. Brian Green, Cosmologist,  states that we do live in a boundless universe (he says the math directs us toward this conclusion), but he says that each of these alternate universes never intersect.   He believes each of these alternate universes are infinite, but also the multiverse, which contains them are infinite, and that these alternate universes never intersect.  I believe Dr Brian Green is wrong on this particular point, and that bubble, elastic, or alternate universes are infinite variations of our universe, but are like biological cell walls, and are permeable when the conditions exist for exchange of energy to occur.

Intersection of Permeable Universes in the Multiverse

Its kind of like you enjoy your own personal sandbox, or bubble universe, and then pour [some of] the sand into another box.  Now, that child may play with the sand differently, explore the universe of that sandbox very differently, even in ways you may find grotesque, like eating the sand.  However, it seems to me that with your own imagination, desires, based on your own experiences, and neuro, bio, chemical existence, there is only so much you can do (initially) in that sand box, and hey, it might be a lot of fun for a eons or so, but after a while, you might like to even see what other kids do in the sandbox.  Maybe, just maybe, they may give you ideas on what to do next time when you play with the sand.  But letting other kids play with ‘your’ sandbox too long might get boring, but if you ‘take it away’ too soon, then maybe you’ll miss other things.   Sometimes bigger, or more influential,  kids may even bully the younger kids into giving up their playtime up in the sandbox, even tricking them, or not by citing rules (that’s assuming there is only one sandbox). 

The Sandbox: What will you do?

 After all, I think for us all to truly evolve, we need to be given the opportunity to willingly, not by force, or tricked, to admit we’ve done all we can for now in the sandbox.  However, I think what we all don’t really understand, or maybe I’m missing the boat, if we truly do live in a boundless universe, can’t we all just have our own sandboxes, and share TRUTH in permeable opportunities.

I am also exploring what makes each individual collective maintain its coherence.  I have an image for that, but it may be a bit premature to share with the general audience, because of the immaturity of the idea, or I need to clean it up a bit.

Evolpe Corporation

Zookeeper, the Test and the Child

This post is about Hashem, the Zookeeper of our existence.  She understands the rules of our environments, understands how to treat and care for the animals in their collective cages, almost as if, even possibly so, they are her children.  However, can she relate to these animals, just as if they were her own, a part of her collective intelligence?

To analogously put it, let’s say this Zookeeper is a woman who cannot have children, and would like to relate to these animals as her children, but she probably feels the relationship could only go so far, because after all, they are only animals, a lower breed of intelligent life.  Lets now say this woman can live for eternity, thus time has no meaning.

Now if this Zookeeper lived an eternity, how do you think she would feel, like a master of dominance of the animals, or bored, and eventually wish some of the animals can truly relate.   Some of these species of animals may even relate to the Zookeeper’s intelligence on some level, but after ‘a while’, the Zookeeper may even be so bored as to hope for a new zookeeper to replace herself.  She may even get frustrated with these animals, and I’m sure you can empathize, because…remember empathy is one of the keys to our collective existence.     

This Zookeeper of life may even want to start over with a new breed of animal, however, that animal, the created animal like child continues to be a stubborn sucker, and keeps on trying to ‘escape’ death, e.g. pandemics, but after all, what really is escape?  Eventually, the animal(s) of the Zoo, if they don’t die from lack of being able to care for themselves because the zookeeper is no longer ‘in the picture’, if the animal(s) eventually become intelligent enough, the cyclical reaction occurs, an understanding, and then the animal now becomes the Zookeeper, and cares, and/or creates for animals of its own.

If a Zookeeper found a potential candidate species, it would even put this collective of animals, a species, under the most stressful of conditions such as jealousy, temptation, hatred creating conditions that may drive an animal to react to a situation, and that reaction could either be one of ‘rash’ judgment, or using the keys of existence, such as empathy, a collective of species can react, and in a sense pass the test(s), what may seem like harsh, and cruel tests.

Is life, all of these ‘bubble universes’ in the Multiverse, are they ‘failed’ cages without Zookeepers to test the animals, or are these environments  used to perform more animal testing , continue to induce stress for a more selfish reasons of the Zookeeper(s) herself.  We are all, by nature, centric minded, and guided by our existence of who we are, our experiences and our structural definition.  

Question is, in life, if you did in fact have the option to choose an existence, would you choose to be the Zookeeper, or would you continually act as an animal, allowing yourself to be cared for even though you may have the intelligence, and capacity to reach the responsibility of becoming the Zookeeper, and in turn how would the Zookeeper react.

Maybe our caretakers are not like Zookeepers but more like looking after animals in a cage, which are being slow roasted, ready to eat, and all these life tests are cooking us under pressure.  We men are the animals, and we just need pressure applied to us.  Our heart pumps faster, and boom, we’re ready to be consumed.    As we all know, we give off energy, and maybe more of our energy is produced under stress / pressure conditions, and our energy is like food to these so called ‘caretakers’, or Lords.

Stargate Atlantis Evil Ancients: Energy Derived from Stress

Maybe the number 42, “the answer” in The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, just means the temperature men need to cook at, and it’s 42 degrees Celsius, in addition to the job and money pressures, just add in a little sun tan, and boom, we’ve got cancer, death, and then hell is we get to view, like ghosts, watch people we love get in bad situations, and are powerless to do anything about it, abstractly view people that we thought we knew and liked, or loved,  speak about us in bad ways, or misinterpret the deeds we did in life.  Want to then beg the Zookeeper to be let ‘back into the game’?  To be reincarnated so you can make a difference, or at least, play the game a bit differently, as to [NOT] do X, Y, or Z?  Why bother, or are there even more hellish interactions, where you become food for the feast?

Something to look forward to, huh?

I know we are always learning, and changing our point of view.  Here is where hope comes in!  During the summer, I’ll still have some, but the summer is nearly over.  I hope this permutation of existence, this Bubble Universe, or at least, some of the ones in which we can permeate our energies to,  manage to sort things out the way we collectively, and individually find our continual, inner peace. 

All the Best to All of Us.

Evolpe Corp

Collective Intelligence Guide Book: Brief Introduction

The (Multi) Universe(s) Podcast

As Dr. Brian Greene, the Cosmologist puts it, if we live in a boundless universe, and he says the math leads us to this conclusion, then there exists infinite variations of this universe if you ‘go out far in space’.  It’s like flipping a coin 500 times, the likelihood it will all turn up heads each time is not very likely, a very small probability, but still probable.   Meaning there could be infinite variations of your own existence ‘out there’, same green shirt you wore today, and the same thing happened to you three weeks ago when you stubbed their toe on that twig in a state called Montana.

Anyway, the basic variation between what Dr. Brian Greene, a brilliant Scientist, believes and I believe is that he says that each of these universes although are infinite, can never touch, and I believe that these ‘alternate universes’ are permeable, meaning, they can not only expand and contract, but also can touch, and exchange, what we can conceive of as energy / information. 

Now, taking ALL that into assumption, i.e., we have these alternate universes, and they are all made up of variations of some existence, THIS BLOG IS ABOUT what governs these universes, and all of existence. What, who, or whom puts our world into some kind of specific, rule like, or even mathematical order, if you will.  Well, I would say, we have some type of what we may consider a ‘deity’, which could exist as a collective intelligence, and/or a singular intelligence which basically decides truth, in a sense. 

Now, does that deity define the order, and, or maintain the order?   These collective intelligences could be collectives of flesh and blood beings, like Cats or Birds, or even of energy, and this leads me to an analogous, somewhat, almost synonymous representation between the ancient Egyptian cultures/societies.  Do we really know, are we really sure that we, with all our ‘technologies’, we are more advanced in understanding the true existence of the universe than these other ancient peoples who ‘communicated with pictures’, hieroglyphs.  In some sense we marvel at their pyramid structures.

Pyramid: Mathematical Wonder?

 We have a basic understanding that Egyptians / Hebrews had knowledge of what we would consider advanced mathematics because of the accuracy, and the geometric and architectural knowledge it took to create the pyramids, but did these ancient cultures truly know more about existence, about things like ‘the unifying theory of everything’. 

What if what the ancient Egyptians considered a deity was really an person, or interpreter to a collective intelligence, like there are statues with the head of a bird, and the body of a man, and that person was actually was able in interact with that collective of beings, like the bird.

Sky G-D; Half Man / Half Bird

 

Would that half man / half bird be able to communicate with this collectives of bird animals, and be able to access their collective knowledge for all existance, transcending even death?  Are there rules of collectives of intelligence that a being of that collective must behave in a specific way, under certain conditions in order to be considered a part of that collective?  Does the collective itself enforce those rules, as well as the rest of ‘the natural world’, other collective intelligence? 

Let’s now get down to the atomic level, and if we see atoms, they behave in particular patterns.  Are they, these atoms, influenced by ‘outside forces’?  Well, we believe atoms can bond under particular circumstances.  We have a collection of atoms of the same type, atoms that have Half-life, decay rates, and also catalysts, which can create bonds, or even force the deconstruction of a collection of compound (multiple bonded atoms) elements.  Better yet, what happens when you take a particle, and thrust it toward other particles, like the Famous Hadron Collider, almost like a catalyst, which may reveal other types of collectives of even more basic types of elements within the universe.  I like this interesting collider idea, and in some sense, it’s a fast, almost violent thrust of a particle into another particle, like the initial break the game billiards / pool.

So to become an Earth deity, like a King, or pharaoh,  is to be able to a) interpret the laws of a particular collective of intelligence; b) act as, and be accepted / bonded with that collective, within the confines of their rules, [analogously, if needed] ;  and  c) exist between two or more collectives, like that ‘half bird / half man’, allowing the flow of what we would call energy / information, allowing ‘alternate collectives’ to interact, and in some cases co-exist, like a permeable microbiological cell of the human body which functions to serve the entire collective, for the sustained existence of that collective.

I would unfortunately also think that if all this were true, taking one particle and violently thrusting it against another particle to force these singular particles apart to discover the collective within, and how they bond with other collectives is a much more abrasive approach, than what I would consider the permeability of cell membranes to interact, and exchange ‘information’.    The abrasive approach, although somewhat primitive in nature, as well as dangerous to the entire existence of its own collective has the potential to be productive, and accelerate evolutionary growth.  I think some of the ancient societies might have had their own approaches to these types of evolutionary progression; e.g. Astec’s eating the hearts of their enemies?  Yuch!

Aztec Human Sacrifice

In Egyptian societies, the way people were mummified, we’re talking kings, nobility!   It seems a bit violent to me to rip the brain out of the head through the nose, and preserve some of the body parts in jars for the sake of preservation of a society, and to maintain that connection with what may have been considered the afterlife.  Although, I am sure history is only half truths, malicious intent, or not.

Let’s expand our focus, zoom out to an entire interaction of animal / biological collectives, in a sense, a world, or a universe perspective, or from the Cosmology perspective, if we get to a macro perspective, maintaining order between all of these alternate collectives,  I would think all divinity comes from energy, pure energy, like a Sun, again back to ‘the Eye of RA’, or a Sun deity.  If we truly think about it, the sun, stars, provide energy for all growth, and we already know technologically, information travels by light, through fiber optics, for example.  Do the stars then ultimately maintain the local collective, or the system lord, like the [solar] system lord.  Then finally, expand our minds out even further, do each of the stars in the sky, do they act as their own intelligence, some more ‘mature’ than others’.  Do they interact on some level?  Now imagine a deity, a being, just like we spoke of the half man / half bird ancient Egyptian deities, what about an entity that could act as an interpreter, the cell membrane, and act as a ’control flow’ valve to the stars, the objects in our universe which actually create and control life.

So on one level, you may have a system lord, who is essentially the local ‘Sun G-d’ who can control life, and every being within that system, that solar system, is governed by this system lord.  Not hard or far to imagine if we go back to the fiber optics, and the light traveling information aspect. 

Light, Even Sunlight, May Contain Information

Imaging a being can interact with the local Sun, and ‘program’ in a sense, the rules are of the local system.  How the local collectives behave, habitats, and interactions between the life forms that ‘feed off” the energy in the [solar] system hierarchy.  Now, what about sending objects into the sun, the local star?  Think that would change the way the Sun controls life in that system, ‘to communicate with the local Sun/Star’.  The action potentially can alter the [solar] system rules, but remember, the star is a collective intelligence, and just like two people talking, even though you’re saying something, doesn’t mean the other person hears, understands, cares, or believes, what you saying.  And for that type of sacrifice, the sacrifice of old, like throwing a virgin into a volcano, well, hey, it’s not really an efficient conversation to say the least, and we humans, even planetary bodies in the solar system, remember we revolve around the Sun, not the other way around.   We can’t really tell it what to do, can we?  The sacrifice, crude as it may be just may allow the Star ‘to know’, or understand the existence of that being, maybe, like absorbing a societies culture with one sacrifice.

Volcano Human Sacrifice: Brief, One Sided and Inefficient Conversation

Even if we evolved as a culture, but still kept on trying to appease the ’system lords’ in this ancient archaic manner, eventually, even if we didn’t diminish / degrade our collective self to the point where we could not sustain a cohesive collective, the ‘System Lord’ may just get bored, and say “hey, let’s start over, it might take a few million years, but this evolutionary path is a stalemate, and may never lead to a ‘collective upgrade’.”  Keep in mind, you may think that’s what you want, but you really don’t.  It’s very, very boring to continually lead a life over and over again.  Try playing the game “Life” like a billion times in a row, with some variations, some timeouts, but still, gets old. 

What’s an ‘ideal’ collective upgrade?  A self-sustaining, permeable membrane between energy bubbles within the “multiverse” (i.e. alternate universes), and in a limited form with some advancement,  it’s a ‘brief’, permeable membrane, and this effect can also occur within a tighter focus, like within the local universe, between the stars.   Time, as mentioned above, the word ‘brief” would be just as analagous with some chemical compounds, or elements can bond over a ’brief’ periods of time, such as a Half-life, or decay rate.

Here’s the best part.  I believe that there are a ton of cultures within our society that already know all about most of this, but why keep it a secret?  Maybe there are rites of passage into their culture(s), the hidden knowledge, ideologies of truth?  Opposing perspectives, that cannot or do not desire to form a singular perspective and/or collective rules engine clashes?  Maybe there hasn’t evolved a ‘truth’ or true system lord of this local star yet?  Or maybe, it’s the way of the universe, the star is born, and its evolutionary cycle allows for the potential integration into the larger collective.

 I wouldn’t go thinking that the job of ‘king’ of the system lords, a system lord, a animal collective lord, let alone a human politician is an easy task.  As flesh and blood beings we have a very difficult decisions to make, and primarily because of our form factor, our biological form factor, and then there is our ‘believes’, as a result of conditioning in things like attachment to objects, loved ones, even the rationale of time, stress, and ‘limited resources’.  All these concepts may just be mechanisms to impose a hierarchical structure within the ‘universal order’, and/or a process to test if achievement to the next level of evolution, e.g. collective agreement, acceptance into a collective, typically through a ‘rite of passage’, and/or a mechanism of slavery, but is it a slavery of self, and maybe for good, or bad intentions.   One other bit to the mix, if we just got energy from our local ‘food group’, the Sun, would it be completly harmonous, maybe not because of the maturity of the star, or maybe, those other stars, or star systems, light does travel from other stars.  Maybe its a combination of both, i.e. if our local star was mature enough, it could potentially deter outside influence, or encourage it?

Lastly, take a religion, or culture that associates itself with that of the stars, and at the same time, has a rule which states that no symbol, except for the collective itself, can represent the lord, and creator. 

The Evolpe Corporation

Rumpelstiltskin, Name that Collective Intelligence!

bi

Rumpelstiltskin, and the Actions of the Collective Self

Collectives of Intelligence are like what we consider, a pecking order of sorts.  There is a hierarchy, however, if you believe in one variation of the Multiverse theory, these hierarchies  can also intersect:

Of Flesh and Blood-

Collectives made up of flesh and blood, of sensory inputs and outputs we can most commonly relate to can be manipulated by the same sensory perception, signals to the eyes and ears, for example, but just as in the story of ‘the Kings new clothes’, alternate beings can walk about without ever being seen, if creatures of a alternate collective cannot perceive or interpret them.

One of the most prevalent species of our environment, which could exist as a collective intelligence,  driven or motivated by food, would most likely be insects.  Insects of all varying degrees, mostly those that can co-exist, cohabitate harmoniously together, such as bees, or ants, may be most likely the most intelligent collective intelligences on the planet, given ‘time to evolve’, and since time does not exist, false assumption in a multiverse, then it is true, these cohabative insect species, such as ants, are the most intelligent collective on the planet.  However, size does matter in this case; and the driving force behind the most intelligent collective intelligences are a few common traits: 

• They cooperatively interact to accomplish a goal, or goals that continues their existence
• There is some mechanism by which they interact, which allows them to collectively produce a self-sustaining result;  HOWEVER, interaction methods by the way the collectives communicate can be faulty, either by natural progression (e.g. ‘miscommunication’), or malicious intent by another collectives looking to control over other collectives.
• Their size, the numbers of individual collective units;  The size of the collectives do vary, and the power, or ability to accomplish tasks are enhanced or detracted by their size, and typically, the more units within the collective, the more that can be achieved;  however, as a collective evolves, and I mean greatly evolved beyond the need for X; the numbers of individual collective units now serve an alternate purpose, as to their ability to accomplish tasks, thus meaning the goal of the collectives change.

Arachnids are an interesting breed of insect, one to study closer, they elusively trap and eat other insects, and their young, I believe, are known to eat the mother, once the babies, are hatched.  I also believe that the mother spider, once the husband looses its usefulness, as a reproductive agent, the mother arachnid is known to use the father as food, so yes, it is interesting to understand this collective intelligence, what their inputs and outputs are, what drives, or motivates them, and how they can be manipulated.

Biological cells, like as in single, or multicelled organisms, I wonder what their inputs and outputs are, and what motivates them. 

Of Energy -

Now I believe that the farther down you go, in terms of examining life, the more you can understand about the existance of the wider picture of life, e.g. examining the smaller picture, DOES give you the insight into the bigger picture.   Think we lost our scientific way when we stopped believing in that path as the unifying theory of everything.

Lets use the concept of the multiverse, that is, if you accept the multiverse is boundless, and there can be infinite alternate universes that exist within the ‘overall universe’, as discussed in topics by Dr. Brian Greene, Cosmologist,  if we try to analogously represent a microbiological environment, such as a human body, or even a petrie dish: a) we can still have what are termed ‘Bubble Universes’, analogously compared to ‘Cells’, and may be permeable; and from our perspective, infinite in variation; however, b) there can still be confines of this analogous microbiological environment.   I would refer to these bounds of the multiverse, as to an elastic, rubber band, streachable and retractable, and can conform to alternate shapes, consisting of more or less permutations of alternate universes, as required;  Ultimately, ever flexible, ever evolving.

The Evolpe Corporation